The connection was lost. Trying to connect again.

Post by Amelia Bellamy-Royds

Earlier in the thread

Amelia Bellamy-Royds @AmeliaBR@front-end.social

Catching up with a friend last night, he wants to show me his new app.

It's a scheduling app for his dog-walking business, with built-in emails, invoicing, expense tracking, and financial reports ready to send to his accountant.

He's not a programmer. He developed it over 6 months by asking ChatGPT to add one feature at a time.

I warned him to double-check the numbers. I warned him to make sure he can still use it fully if the AI subscription becomes unaffordable.

But it seems useful.
1/?

· Public

Amelia Bellamy-Royds @AmeliaBR@front-end.social

This is the real paradigm shift that "vibe coding" genAI creates. Not software companies trying to make more code with fewer programmers. But non-programmers building tools for themselves.

An Edmonton company, Jobber, makes an app very similar to the one my friend built: scheduling & invoicing on the go for tradespeople who do in-person jobs for many clients. Their pricing page currently has the basic app at $29/month, on sale from $49. They've built a 1000-employee business on this.

2/

· Public

Chris Silverman 🌻 @csilverman@mastodon.social

@AmeliaBR It's odd how I rarely see this side of the issue discussed. A month ago, I saw someone on Reddit talking about how they built themselves an accessibility tool with Claude, replacing a professional solution that required a subscription.

There's much to criticize about AI-based development, but I think it's also becoming a sort of democratizing force that lets folks build tools that either aren't profitable enough to exist, or are inaccessible to some because they need to be profitable.

· Public

Amelia Bellamy-Royds @AmeliaBR@front-end.social

@csilverman I have heard that "democratizing" term mentioned before — and the natural push-back that creating more dependence on online subscription services is hardly distributed power — but it was still interesting to see this example.

Given my online networks, so much of the talk about code generation is from the perspective of genAI as used by programmers. Or as used on public-facing websites where other people are impacted by inaccessible slop.

It's different making software for yourself.

· Public

Replies

Chris Silverman 🌻 @csilverman@mastodon.social

@AmeliaBR I think the difference is that with LLMs, you can build something that you own. You'd need to pay the AI to expand or maintain your app, but the app itself is yours.

I'd be uneasy if I had a business that relied on an AI subscription to keep developing the product (although open-weight models may change that). For personal tools, though, I do see LLMs as a chance to own again, not rent.

And honestly, I would not mourn the demise of SaaS. I've always thought that model was unethical.

· Public